

 Know the following definitions.
 Argument (what constitutes a valid argument?)
 Fallacy
 Modus ponens
 Modus tollens
 Do the following exercises from the textbook (Kohar).
 2.2.3 (a), (b), 2.2.4, 2.2.5, 2.2.6, 2.2.7, 2.2.8, 2.2.9, 2.2.12, 2.2.13, 2.2.14, 2.2.15, 2.2.16, 2.2.17, 2.2.19
 2.4.1, 2.4.2
 2.9.4 a) b) c), 2.9.5, 2.9.6, 2.9.7
 Using the rules of inference, prove that modus ponens is a valid argument; that is, show that .
 The following argument is called affirming the consequent. Is it valid?
 Know the following definitions.
(Premise)
(Premise)
(Conclusion)
 The following argument is called denying the antecedent. Is it valid?
(Premise)
(Premise)
(Premise) 
No comments
Comments feed for this article
Trackback link: https://kohar.ca/mae106discretemathematicswithprobabilityfall2018/mae1062018assignment3/trackback/